February 23, 2012  
Fossil Hunting

Fossil Forum

Fossil Chat

Videos

Fossil Articles

Paleo Cartoons

Contact Us

Fossil Hunting Excursions

Image Galleries

Fossil Links

FAQ
Trip Reports

  You are here:  Forums    
Artifact and Fossil Forum

Fossil and Artifact Forum

Thanks for visiting our fossil forum! Discuss shark teeth, artifacts, and other fossils on these fossil discussion groups.

In order to post on these forums, you must be a registered member of this site. Membership is free and open to all. Use the register link and start discussing fossils with other fossil enthusiasts from all over the world.

Please try to keep your responses relevant to each thread. If you can't find a thread about what you want to discuss, feel free to create a new one!

July 7, 2010 This is the new version of the Black River Fossils forum. If you can't log in and you used to be able to, please register again. During the conversion from the old version to the new, some user accounts did not translate. Sorry for the inconvenience!


Forums
 
ForumForumFossilsFossilsMicro FossilsMicro FossilsHow small does a tooth have to be, to be a Micro?How small does a tooth have to be, to be a Micro?
Previous Previous
 
Next
 Disabled
New Post
 10/7/2011 11:04 AM
 

This may be an odd question, and it may not even belong in this part of the forum, but I've wondered for some time now.

What is the line between micro and average?

Recently I have found a Mako, in perfect condition I might add (rare for me) that is around an inch and .8 long, and around an inch and .2 wide (at the root), and it is my biggest yet, but it makes me wonder how big they have to be to no longer be considered a micro.

Any opinions?

New Post
 10/8/2011 7:54 PM
 

We, as fossil hunters, use the term VERY loosely. We should be referring to them as macro-fossils, but micro-fossils just sounds cooler... the term "micro" comes from microscope. Don't get me wrong... some of the teeth we find deserve the term micro-fossil. A buddy sent me some material from New Mexico and let me tell you... It was hard to see the teeth even with 18X magnification. I didn't know that teeth got that small...

I posted a trip report under Alabama called "microfossils"... check it out and you will see some small teeth (but nothing like I mentioned above).

Here's a definition from Wikipedia...

The term macrofossil stands in opposition to the term microfossil (a.k.a. "micro-fossil"). Microfossils, by contrast, require substantial magnification for evaluation by fossil-hunters or professional paleontologists. As a result, most fossils observed in the field and most "museum-quality" specimens are macrofossils.

Previous Previous
 
Next
 Disabled
ForumForumFossilsFossilsMicro FossilsMicro FossilsHow small does a tooth have to be, to be a Micro?How small does a tooth have to be, to be a Micro?

  

Fossils

Artifacts

Formations

Users Online
Membership Membership:
Latest New User Latest: christophe
Past 24 Hours Past 24 Hours: 1
Prev. 24 Hours Prev. 24 Hours: 0
User Count Overall: 707

People Online People Online:
Visitors Visitors: 0
Members Members: 0
Total Total: 0

Online Now Online Now:
  

Facebook
  

Copyright 2011 by www.blackriverfossils.org Terms Of Use Privacy Statement